<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Performance of Different Types of For Loops</title> <atom:link href="http://rexflex.net/2007/07/performance-of-different-types-of-for-loops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://rexflex.net/2007/07/performance-of-different-types-of-for-loops/</link> <description>Rants of a software developer</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 03:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Jason</title><link>http://rexflex.net/2007/07/performance-of-different-types-of-for-loops/#comment-49</link> <dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 03:31:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rexflex.net/archives/2007/07/12/performance-of-different-types-of-for-loops/#comment-49</guid> <description>OMG how did I get here? Im so lost.Last post was in JULY?!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG how did I get here? Im so lost.</p><p>Last post was in JULY?!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Josh</title><link>http://rexflex.net/2007/07/performance-of-different-types-of-for-loops/#comment-48</link> <dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:21:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rexflex.net/archives/2007/07/12/performance-of-different-types-of-for-loops/#comment-48</guid> <description>Hey, HEY YOU.BLOG MORE.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, HEY YOU.</p><p>BLOG MORE.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ryan</title><link>http://rexflex.net/2007/07/performance-of-different-types-of-for-loops/#comment-47</link> <dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:44:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rexflex.net/archives/2007/07/12/performance-of-different-types-of-for-loops/#comment-47</guid> <description>You&#039;re this bored and this is the best you can do?Did you take into account that in your optimized loop you have the count set as a variable, where in your standard loop you have to calculate it every single time? That would have been a nice intermediary step.Next see how long it takes if you just hard code it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re this bored and this is the best you can do?</p><p>Did you take into account that in your optimized loop you have the count set as a variable, where in your standard loop you have to calculate it every single time? That would have been a nice intermediary step.</p><p>Next see how long it takes if you just hard code it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: codePoet</title><link>http://rexflex.net/2007/07/performance-of-different-types-of-for-loops/#comment-46</link> <dc:creator>codePoet</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 19:11:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rexflex.net/archives/2007/07/12/performance-of-different-types-of-for-loops/#comment-46</guid> <description>m-curlz would be proud!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>m-curlz would be proud!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 286/300 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: c520208.r8.cf2.rackcdn.com

Served from: rexflex.net @ 2012-02-10 01:47:47 -->
