<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Performance of Different Types of For Loops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rexflex.net/2007/07/performance-of-different-types-of-for-loops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rexflex.net/2007/07/performance-of-different-types-of-for-loops/</link>
	<description>Rants of a software developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:26:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://rexflex.net/2007/07/performance-of-different-types-of-for-loops/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 03:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rexflex.net/archives/2007/07/12/performance-of-different-types-of-for-loops/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>OMG how did I get here? Im so lost.

Last post was in JULY?!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG how did I get here? Im so lost.</p>
<p>Last post was in JULY?!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://rexflex.net/2007/07/performance-of-different-types-of-for-loops/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rexflex.net/archives/2007/07/12/performance-of-different-types-of-for-loops/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Hey, HEY YOU.

BLOG MORE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, HEY YOU.</p>
<p>BLOG MORE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://rexflex.net/2007/07/performance-of-different-types-of-for-loops/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rexflex.net/archives/2007/07/12/performance-of-different-types-of-for-loops/#comment-47</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re this bored and this is the best you can do?

Did you take into account that in your optimized loop you have the count set as a variable, where in your standard loop you have to calculate it every single time? That would have been a nice intermediary step.

Next see how long it takes if you just hard code it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re this bored and this is the best you can do?</p>
<p>Did you take into account that in your optimized loop you have the count set as a variable, where in your standard loop you have to calculate it every single time? That would have been a nice intermediary step.</p>
<p>Next see how long it takes if you just hard code it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: codePoet</title>
		<link>http://rexflex.net/2007/07/performance-of-different-types-of-for-loops/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>codePoet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 19:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rexflex.net/archives/2007/07/12/performance-of-different-types-of-for-loops/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>m-curlz would be proud!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>m-curlz would be proud!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.253 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-09-09 10:18:47 -->
